| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: `a landmark victory for the rule of law and a defeat for unchecked |
From: Gary Britt Not "enemy", "Enemy Combatants" and "Illegal Enemy Combatants", and because of the problems you describe these enemy combatants are entitled to a hearing before a military tribunal and an appeal to the DC Circuit to challenge the rightfulness of their classification and detention. Unlike German and Japanese prisoners of war from world war II. Gary Robert Comer wrote: > Part of the problem here is that the "War on Terror", isn't a war like > previous ones, the enemy is not so easy to determine, so it's far too > easy to just label someone an enemy. There is no Germans, or Japanese > to target (though what we did to the Japanese American's is pretty > shameful), the enemy is just an ideal that anyway can be accused of, > so there *has* to be more controls on just who is labeled an enemy. > --- BBBS/NT v4.01 Flag-5* Origin: Barktopia BBS Site http://HarborWebs.com:8081 (1:379/45) SEEN-BY: 633/267 5030/786 @PATH: 379/45 1 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.