From: Attila 

On 26 Mar 2007 13:16:18 -0700, "Rudy Canoza"
 in alt.abortion with message-id
 wrote:

>On Mar 26, 11:52 am, duke  wrote:
>> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:54:39 GMT, Rudy Canoza 
wrote:
>> >>>>> Why do you keep referring to a god when you
have yet to prove one even
>> >>>>> exists?
>> >>>> It's only logical.
>> >>> Not an answer.
>> >> You can't refute it.
>> >It isn't his job to refute your illogic.
>>
>> Not only that, but he can't.
>
>Not his burden.  It's your burden to support your claim.  You can't.
>In the absence of proof, the prudent course is to disbelieve.

That is a burden all cultists reject.  They cannot support their position
or their rants with any proof or evidence so they evade the issue either by
ignoring it or by any number of evasions.  Especially by trying to take the
discussion in some other direction.

It is amazing how positions are taken and statements made that would be
considered insane with any other subject yet are expected to be accepted
without question if the subject is cults.

--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag