Hello Robert.

29 May 04 13:55, you wrote to Ward Dossche:

 WD|>> However the IC has a 100% freedom to "interprete" as
he/she pleases
 WD|>> whatever he/she considers worthy of an interpretation. By that virtue
 WD|>> alone it becomes a formal part of policy until overruled.

 RC> ˙Section 7.2 leave no room for interpretatio:

 RC> ==============

 RC> 7.2  Selection

 RC> The International Coordinator is selected (or removed) by an absolute
 RC> majori- ty vote of the Zone Coordinators.

 RC> =============

 RC> Now where can you stick in an interpretaton here, hmm?  "˙n absolute
 RC> majority vote of the Zone Coordinators"

Policy is also quite clear on where an IC can make a policy interpretation:

From Section 7.1:

"In cases not specifically covered by this document, the International Coordi-
          *****************************************
nator may issue specific interpretations or extensions to this policy.  The
Zone Coordinator Council may reverse such rulings by a majority vote."

The election and removal of the IC is specifically covered by the document,
therefore it is not subject to any interpretation by the IC.

Ward knows this. Ward ignores this. Ward is dishonest, a cheat, and a liar.


--- GoldED/W32 3.0.1