From: Attila 

On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 14:22:23 GMT, "Patriot Games"
 in alt.abortion with message-id
 wrote:


>>>>>>>>>>>Lott condoned, not God.
>>>>>>>>>> Prove any god exists.
>>>>>>>>>Why?
>>>>>>>> You mentioned one as if it actually exists
in the real world.  Prove
>>>>>>>> it.
>>>>>>>To who, you?  I owe you nothing.
>>>>>> It appears you cannot support what you say,
>>>>>It appears I owe YOU nothing.
>>>> I never said you did.
>>>Yes, you did, you said, "Prove it."
>> You made an assertion - it is your burden...
>
>No such burden exists.  I can say anything I want, I can make any assertion
>I want.

Of course you can.  But those who make claims are expected to prove them or
be considered an unreliable source of information.  Is anything you say
true?  How is one to know?


>
>You can't do shit-all about it.

I can simply point out the facts.

>
>> or as a result of inaction make it obvious
>> that anything you say must be viewed with suspicion.
>
>Feel free to view anything you want any way you want.

I do.

>
>> You owe me nothing - I am simply pointing out the facts.
>
>You're pointing out your personal opinion, which is worth less than nothing
>to me.

No, it is a fact you make claims and assertions and then cannot support them.

How is anyone to know you are not just making stuff up as you go along?



>>>>>If you're not sucking dicks God is happier with you.
>>>> Prove any god exists.
>>>I don't owe you anything.
>> True, but you just made another assertion and the above scenario is in
>> play again.
>
>There is no scenario in play.  I owe you nothing.  No such burden of proof
>exists.  Your problems aren't mine.
>

I have no problem - I am simply point out how you make assertions and then
refuse to support them.  That naturally leads to any reader wondering if
anything you say is true since you refuse to support your comment.

--
Pro-Choice is Pro-Freedom

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag