On 01-19-98 William Elliot wrote to John Boone...
Hello William and thanks for writing,
WE> JB> Ok, now take, an "whole apple" but showing some signs of
WE> JB> wear, rot. Does it belong to the set "whole apple?"
WE> Nope, it is not whole. To be pedantic, the short small
WE> connecting stem if attached, cannot be broken. -)
.
WE> JB> For example, in smelting, it might take temperature
WE> JB> to be raised "a bit" to increase efficiency. How much
WE> JB> is "a bit" on the Temperature scale?
WE> This is a classic application, but alas, I've just glanced
WE> at it. Public library is weak on this topic. If you have
WE> a detailed description of a thermostat control application
WE> we could eke out an answer. That would be an excellent
WE> fuzzy start for us.
No, I don't. More interesting fuzzy applications include,
washing machines, cleaners, etc.
WE> JB> I see you took my example .
WE> Racer who jumps the gun is off to a fuzzy start? -)
Yes .
WE> JB> Kosko, makes the point, fuzzy allows us say a glass belongs
WE> JB> to the set "cup" a bit while belong to the set "glass" more.
WE> Indeed, but ask him to tell you about buckets and leaky
WE> cups and how big of a hole my fuzzy bucket may have and if
WE> a tube is nearly a bucket with a hole for the bottom and
WE> hence a fuzzy cup. Now consider a tall and narrow bucket
WE> with a hole for the bottom, what degree of cup would you
WE> assign to a hose? -) How about the saucer? How about a
WE> flat disk which is a cup with just the bottom remaining?
WE> Ask him to assign precise degrees of cuppishness.
Well, I'll try .
WE> Language can always outstrip the precise syntactics of
WE> mathematics. Is there something paradoxical about
WE> assigning a -precise- degree of whateverness to a fuzzy
WE> notion of -somewhat- like the whatever. -)
Perhaps, it does seem useful, more so than the zero- one
world.
Take care,
John
___
* OFFLINE 1.54
--- Maximus 3.01
---------------
* Origin: Strawberry Fields (1:116/5)
|