From: stumper 

Patriot Games wrote:
> "Andrealphus"  wrote in message
> news:B8XNh.16715$tD2.12658{at}newsread1.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>> In News _bRNh.12955$un.1996{at}trnddc03,, Patriot Games at
>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>>> "Andrealphus"  wrote in message
>>> news:9NENh.15103$PL.930{at}newsread4.news.pas.earthlink.net...
>>>> In News XXyNh.3226$xE.1072{at}trnddc08,, Patriot Games at
>>>> Crazy_Bastard{at}Yahoo.com, typed this:
>>>>> "Dionisio"
 wrote in message
>>>>> news:4605a399$0$27027$4c368faf{at}roadrunner.com...
>>>>>> Patriot Games wrote:
>>>>>>> Because I KNEW Lott DIDN'T commit incest....
>>>>>>> I always prefer to have a liar out themselves
by they themselves
>>>>>>> posting that which traps them....
>>>>>> Now this should be fascinating. Do tell how one
has sex with one's
>>>>>> daughters without > committing incest.
>>>>>> (Don't forget to out yourself, liar.)
>>>>> He was raped, he was unconscious.
>>>> He was unconscious, yet conscious enough to maintain an erection,
>>>> but not conscious enough to recognize is own daughter.
>>>> I think the entire story was written by the villiage idiot.
>>> Thanks for sharing...
>> Can you at least attempt to address the logical flaws in the story?
>
> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>
> The story says he was unconscious.  So he was unconscious.  Nothing
> illogical there.
>
> He apparently had a boner.  That's not physically impossible.  Nothing
> illogical there.
>
> There are no "logical" flaws in the story.
>
> By the way, the "but not conscious enough to recognize is own
daughter" is
> something YOU made up, its NOT in the actual story....  Unconscious is
> unconscious.
>

I agree with you.

But it's just a story.
Why does it matter
whether it has a logical flaws or not?

What makes you think God has to work according to our sense of logic?

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag