JT>JT>you did do, or just keep your mouth shut.  But how
JT>JT>to coach people on that?
JT> VH> Well, the first step is to make them AWARE.  The second step is to 
have
JT> VH> them think it through --
JT> VH> Then, I'd try role-playing -- act it out, with one student being the
JT>I thought you meant instruction through the echos. ...
JT>I see now.
JT> VH> shooter, and the OTHERS coached to deliberately mis-interpret 
hatever
JT> VH> the "shooter" says.
JT>Hell, just have them post in the echos.
That would probably work -- at least to the point of opening people's
eyes as to how what they SAY and how it could be interpreted to a jury
are two entirely different things.
JT> VH> You might simply have someone simply burst into the room, fire a 
lank
JT> VH> or two, run out, and then assign someone as the shooter -- "You just
JT> VH> shot that guy in self-defense.  Tell us what happened."
JT> VH> That should be an interesting exercise -- particularly if you
JT> VH> unobstrusively video-taped it.
JT>This can be arranged.
It would be interesting -- I've developed a lot of training on strange
subjects and skills in my time.  I'd find developing a course like that
interesting.
Now, could we SELL it? :-)
--- PCBoard (R) v15.21/M 2
---------------