ML> Not being a programmer, these questions may seem 
 ML> stupid, but could it be something in one of the 
 ML> libraries? Or some other file in the source directory 
 ML> that the compiler may have opened without your 
 ML> knowledge?  Broken compiler?

That's what I thought but I checked all the header & include files in
Watcom and Maximus source. There were undeclared "Rxframeind"
& "Rxtype" (ie. without the "_" prefix) which I
fixed, but now it's complaining about _Rxframeind and _Rxtype (ie. with
"_" prefix) and I have no idea where it got those prefixes from
... my best guess is a constructor somewhere generated them ...

Maybe I should just axe it out of the source and compile Maximus without
the internal Zmodem.

I'm waiting for a reply from Bo Simonsen.

 ML> Like I said, I'm not a programmer by any stretch of the 
 ML> imagination, but I find it implausible that random 
 ML> reference types would be generated by the compiler - 
 ML> unless it's broken or picking them up from some 
 ML> undisclosed location.  I don't suppose the program 
 ML> pointed you to any line number in the source, did it?

I took a look at some of the Watcom linker's .map and .err files but they
didn't give me any useful details.

--- Maximus/2 3.01