-=> Quoting William Mcbrine to James Bradley <=-

 WM> BTW, if you have a working config with the DOS version, you can just
 WM> copy that MMAIL.RC over the Windows one. There are no differences.

 I was thinking of that, but as the two unzip and zip lines were attempted
with identical entries, and I checked real close for any typo's... 

 WM> Also, under Windows 98, you may actually be better off with the DOS
 WM> version anyway.   Console app support (what the Win32 version of
 WM> MultiMail uses) is flaky in Windows 9x; the DOS version is sometimes
 WM> faster. It's still 32-bit (same size messages, etc.), still supports
 WM> long filenames (through the magic of DJGPP), and still multitasks
 WM> pretty well under Win 9x. The only thing you'd gain with the Win32 port
 WM> is mouse support. 

 Well, the rodent should slow me down. I found the *less* I reach for the
thing, the *more* I get done.

 WM> For use under Windows NT, 2000 or XP, though, I recommend the Win32
 WM> port. 

 As I think the author suggested too. I just had to download both in order
to find out.  For kicks, I will attempt to use the two versions
again, but an updated copy.

 Thanks for the input!



... This is only a hobby... This is only a hobby... Only a hobby...
___ Blue Wave/386v2.30 [NR]

--- Mystic BBS v1.07.3 (DOS)