Offered in evidence:

 Did it take quoting the entire exchange to add 4 letters? Oh,
 and a smiley.

  MG> John Massey -> JOHNJWILSON wrote:
 JM>> JOHNJWILSON -> JOHN MASSEY wrote:
 BK>>>>  I do not *resent* my
 BK>>>>>  service. I resent the fact that the chicken hawks were not
 BK>>>>>  required to serve.

 ->>>> Then that is what you should have said.

 J>>> That is what he said, if you bother to read the entire sentence.
 JM>> cutting it
 J>>> off at the comma has the earmarks of duplicity.

 ->>>> What you said was you resented serving; then into some whine as to
 JM>> why.

 J>>> And you wish not to understand plain English.

 J>>> I think you are crazy not to acknowledge that.

 J>>> (Wilson called me crazy! I'll prove it: "You are
crazy." That what
 JM>> he said.
 J>>> Proof. Right, Ross? )

 JM>> John, you go ahead and think anything you like. Your rantings, like
 JM>> rantings of the insane, are of little consequence.

 MG> GMTA  :)

 MG> -- 
 MG> L'Chaim,
 MG> Mimi

 MG> fcpnmimi(at)cox.net


 MG> "That which does not kill us makes us stronger."
 MG>  - Friedrich Nietzsche

 MG> --- Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)
 MG>  (1:123/789.0) 

BOB KLAHN bob.klahn{at}sev.org   http://home.toltbbs.com/bobklahn

... !{at}#$%^&*: The most widely used computer term worldwide.
 * Silver Xpress V4.5/P [Reg]
--- Platinum Xpress/Win/WINServer v3.0pr5a