Hi, Max!

08 jan 03 17:12, Stas Degteff wrote to Max Khon:

 MK>> The last question is why source-only tarballs that are
 MK>> distributed from sourceforge have such strange version naming?
 SD> See huskybse/develop-doc for details.
 SD> Short description for CVS tags:
   [...skip..]

   Comment from current Release Manager (me) :-)
   My working environment is Debian GNU/Linux, and I'm produce this steps
for release:
   1) get sources from CVS;
   2) run 'debuild' command for each module - this make set of Debian
binary and source packages;
   3) upload packages to sf.net.

   Because "Husky debian source" == "Husky tarball
source" (upstream code include debian package stuff), I'm don't any
convert/rename operations; however distribution tarballs have
"-1" at the end of it's name - this is debian
"revision". Don't pay attention to this :)

 SD> We (deveopers) plan make next stable branch with version numbers 1.4
 SD> for all programs modules (hpt, htick etc but not libraries smapi &
 SD> fidoconfig) for make easy compose/build right distributives.

   It's true!

   Good night!   /_Pavel_/


--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5