From: stumper 

james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> In article ,
>  stumper  wrote:
>
>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>
>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
,
>>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>>>>> In article
,
>>>>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> God is better handled by social science
>>>>>>>>>> than by natural science.
>>>>>>>>> did she tell you that personally?
>>>>>>>> Does your government talk to you in person?
>>>>>>> are you afraid to answer my question?
>>>>>> God don't talk to me in person.
>>>>> then how can you support your claim above? is it a false claim?
>>>> It's just a working hypothesis, dear.
>>> you should have labeled it as such. doing so would have made you
>>> appear rather stupid, but probably not as dishonest as simply making
>>> the claim did.
>> I did so, many times up front, dear.
>
> in which post, exactly?


Just Goggle this newsgroup
with "Stumper working hypothesis," please.

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag