Ed Hulett -> Mimi Gallandt wrote:
 EH> Mimi Gallandt -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 MG>> Ed Hulett -> Ross Cassell wrote:
 EH>>> Ross Cassell -> Bob Klahn wrote:

 BK>>>>>>>  Then let's go into Hulett's
embellishments, and see how that
 BK>>>>>>>  plays out.

 RC>>>>>> Ok, what has Ed embellished?

 EH>>> I have embellished nothing.

 MG>> People like Klahn, Sauer and Wilson don't understand that men like you
 MG>> who are self assured because you know who you are and don't need other
 MG>> people's affirmation to be secure in that knowledge. It is simply a
 MG>> concept they can not understand because they've never felt that way
 MG>> about themselves.

 EH> What this is all about is Klahn trying (and failing) to defend Sauer.
 EH> Sauer came swaggering into FIDO trying to claim he was something that he
 EH> most assuredly is not. His claims to have worked on A-10 weapons systems
 EH> is but one example.

Not being Klahn, Sauer or Wilson I completely understand that. :)

 EH> In contrast, Klahn is trying to paint me as worse than Sauer by claiming
 EH>  I somehow embellished my experiences. I have not embellished anything.
 EH> I don't have to. There are certain things I do know and what I don't
 EH> know, I know where to find the information.

I know that.

 EH> Klahn's example is the infamous "planes not flying without radios"
 EH> thread. He claims I tried to embellish my knowledge of military
 EH> communications. That is hilarious when he's the one who claimed military
 EH> planes can't fly without radios.

A classic that will outlive Klahn himself.  :)

 EH> It really must suck being him.

A given and it couldn't happen to a more appropriate person.

-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net


"That which does not kill us makes us stronger."
 - Friedrich Nietzsche

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (Windows/20080421)