From: r{at}somis.org (òR L Measures)

In article , "Robibnikoff"
 wrote:

> ".R L Measures"  wrote in message
> news:r-2603071318310001{at}66-52-38-163.lsan.dock.net...
> > In article ,
"Robibnikoff"
> >  wrote:
> >
> >> ".R L Measures"  wrote in message
> >> news:r-2603070815170001{at}66-52-38-3.lsan.dock.net...
> >> > In article ,
"Robibnikoff"
> >> >  wrote:
> >> >
> >> >> "Rev. Karl E. Taylor"
 wrote in message
> >> >> news:0goid4-6ro2.ln1{at}dhcpdns2.ddsoho.com...
> >> >> > Robert wrote:
> >> >> >> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:58:38 -0400, raven1
> >> >> >>  wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>> On Sat, 24 Mar 2007 14:43:30 -0800,
Robert 
> >> >> >>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>
> >> >> >>>> On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 23:07:08 GMT,
"Smiler" 
> >> >> >>>> wrote:
> >> >> >>>>
> >> >> >>>>>> Not entirely correct. (
Apart from some bloody minded fanatics
> >> >> >>>>>> who
> >> >> >>>>>> are
> >> >> >>>>>> wrong)
> >> >> >>>>>> The Church teaches that the
use of condoms as a means of
> >> >> >>>>>> contraception is
> >> >> >>>>>> wrong.
> >> >> >>>>>> The church also teaches
that in matters of morality everyone
> >> >> >>>>>> must
> >> >> >>>>>> first
> >> >> >>>>>> and foremost obey his or
her conscience.
> >> >> >>>>> But in the eyes of the RCC,
condom use is still wrong.
> >> >> >>>>  Correct, because sex as
entertainment is wrong. Sex is for
> >> >> >>>> conception. The only moral and
effective means of avoiding a
> >> >> >>>> unwanted
> >> >> >>>> pregnancy is abstinence, which also
avoids STDS. STDS and
> >> >> >>>> unwanted
> >> >> >>>> pregnancies are Gods punishment for
having sex, to entertain your
> >> >> >>>> self. Sex is always wrong unless a
husband wants his wife to have
> >> >> >>>> a
> >> >> >>>> child.
> >> >> >>> Must suck to be your wife.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> One of the reasons that I reject religion,
is this kind of
> >> >> >> stupidity.
> >> >> >> Use it or lose it, I am 68 years old, my
wife is 66 we still
> >> >> >> delight
> >> >> >> in the pleasure of having sex, often.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> > I never can get the fundies to actually address
this issue.  I'm 46,
> >> >> > my
> >> >> > wife is 44 and 9 years ago she scared the crap
out of us when she
> >> >> > was
> >> >> > diagnosed with possible ovarian cancer. 
Everything was removed and
> >> >> > fortunately she did not have cancer.  However,
child birth also
> >> >> > became
> >> >> > impossible as well.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Does that mean we are no longer allowed to
enjoy a healthy sex life,
> >> >> > just because we can't have kids now?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Watch the fundies run.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hmmm, I got my tubes tied almost 7 years ago. Should
I not be having
> >> >> sex
> >> >> either?  Oh my.
> >> >
> >> > .  Pray the Hail Mary when you have an orgasm and all
will be well.
> >> > cheers
> >>
> >> Errrr, I don't think that'll do much for my husband, being an
ex-Catholic
> >> altar boy and all that ;)
> >
> > **  If your husband is an ex-altar boy, perhaps, when you are
"riding the
> > pony", he would enjoy having his prostrate stimulated with
Rosary beads  ?
>
> WHAT?!?!?
>
> Oh my stars and garters! ;)

**  I have never participated in such but a friend connected to a
digitally skilled young lady in his apartment who did this.  He reported
that the procedure drained every drop. cheers

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag