On June 28, 2020 17:45, R.Wieser wrote:
> Lew,
>
>> but it might not suit your criteria.
>> Nevertheless, here it is.
>>
>> 1) the Linux networking stack can support multiple IP addresses on
>> a single physical ethernet interface. These addresses /do not/ need to
>> belong to the same subnet, or even the same network.
>
> So, all of those 'puters are than electrically connected ? In that case,
> how does that stop a 'puter from one "subnet" to try to talk to a 'puter
> of another "subnet" ?
Nominally, your (secured) configuration on each system would ensure that
systems neither add themselves to the other subnet nor modify the existing
routing that keeps each subnet logically isolated.
> It just needs to stop or bypass its default gateway, and away it goes !
Implying that your system configurations aren't very secure, I guess.
> Which is pretty-much exactly why I maintain an electrical seperation for
> my subnets.
>
> Thanks for the suggestion though.
C'est la vie. It was a suggestion, nothing more.
Regards
--
Lew Pitcher
"In Skills, We Trust"
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | FidoUsenet Gateway (3:770/3)
|