Alister,

> your reasoning is flawed from the outset as if a device's on
> bothe networks can communicate with the "Post-office"
> then tha become a vector for attack between the networks
> anyway.

Well, feel free to come up with a(ny) solution that /doesn't/ have any
"vector for attack".   Go on, try it.

> But I suspect you are once again forwarding a non-realistic
> requirement just to see how many knots you can tie the
> responders up in.

Damn, there I was, thinking I put a rather simple question forward, and even
described how I thought that it could work.   But somehow it seems to have
gone be a bit over your head ...

I must say I do not quite understand that.   I mean, how hard is it to
imagine a RPi which reads datablocks from one TCP/IP interface and writes it
to the other one (and vise-verse) - and as a result dropping all IP and port
info from either side.   That doesn't really sound like rocket-science, now
does it ?

Regards,
Rudy Wieser

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05