On 6/28/20 8:45 AM, Alister wrote:
> I suggest you re-think your whole setup your reasoning is flawed
> from the outset as if a device's on bothe networks can communicate
> with the "Post-office" then tha become a vector for attack between
> the networks anyway.

Yes, the bastion can talk to both systems and as such could attack both
systems.  But that's not his concern.  He has /specifically/ asked for a
way to configure something, a Raspberry Pi in this case, as a way point
between two systems that can't otherwise communicate with each other.

> But I suspect you are once again forwarding a non-realistic requirement
> just to see how many knots you can tie the responders up in.
I have seen and supported this multiple-isolated-networks many times.

It doesn't matter /why/ he wants to do it.  The fact of the matter is
that he /wants/ to do it.

It is possible to do what he wants to do.

There is no point in passing judgement on him for what he is choosing to do.



--
Grant. . . .
unix || die

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05