From: stumper 

james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> In article ,
>  stumper  wrote:
>
>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>> In article ,
>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>
>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>>> In article
,
>>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> God is better handled by social science
>>>>>>>> than by natural science.
>>>>>>> did she tell you that personally?
>>>>>> Does your government talk to you in person?
>>>>> are you afraid to answer my question?
>>>> God don't talk to me in person.
>>> then how can you support your claim above? is it a false claim?
>> It's just a working hypothesis, dear.
>
> you should have labeled it as such. doing so would have made you
> appear rather stupid, but probably not as dishonest as simply making
> the claim did.


I did so, many times up front, dear.

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag