-=> On 06-08-04  14:01,  Jan Vermeulen <=-
 -=> spoke to Robert Couture about 2nd part <=-

 rc> Interestingly enough, Bob Satti did not initiate the vote, Ward
 rc> did.  Now, according to Ward, the IC must initiate the vote.  That
 rc> being the case, then by Ward's point of view, Bob Satti is still
 rc> the IC as the vote was not according to Policy ;)

 JV> Different situatians: Satti was NOT an ZC, Ward was. \

  What Robert said speaks to Ward's argument that the ZCC vote was
  invalid because he, the IC, did not call for it.   His argument is
  wrong -- and had it had been accepted back then, his election to IC
  would have been invalid because the IC (i.e. Bob Satti) did not call
  for the election.

  Bottom line -- Ward was voted out by exactly the same procedure that
  he used to get voted in.  It was according to P4 then and it was
  according to P4 now.   No difference of substance.

                        dale (at) min (dot) net
                              (1:261/1466)



... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 00:18:47, 09 Jun 2004
___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30

--- Maximus/NT 3.01