Ross Cassell -> Bob Klahn wrote:
 RC> Hello Bob!

 RC> 13 Aug 08 00:20, you wrote to me:

 RC>>> What proof do you have to show that Stan served only 12
 RC>>> years?

 BK>>  I have his own words in his own newspaper. He has shown 12 years
 BK>>  active duty. He was in the service in 1976, out in 1978, back in
 BK>>  in 1982, and out in 1992. I allowed room for some time variance,
 BK>>  in previous msgs. However, what is documented is 12 years. His
 BK>>  own words leave little room for much more than that.

 RC> and why does this distress you so?

Because he's a coward who can't best Stan in a debate and making up this
lie about Stan is the only way he can make himself feel adequate.

 RC>>> After all I served 0, you served 4 years and a certain
 RC>>> someone only 65 days, all uncomparable to the 12 years you
 RC>>> attribute to Stan.

 BK>>  Which has what to do with anything? Did you paint yourself as a
 BK>>  retired Army major?

 RC> If I was a certain someone, according to you I could fit an entire tour
 RC> of duty in the military within 65 days.

 RC>>> Stan commanded a Army Attack Helicopter, you fixed radios.

 BK>>  He *FLEW* an Army attack helicopter, in the states. What's your
 BK>>  point?

 RC> and you fixed radios.

Klahn is far too stupid to realize that flying anything, but especially
helicopters, is far more dangerous than repairing radios.

-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net


Whatcha reading?

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)