From: stumper 

Attila < wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:44:41 -0400, stumper  in
> alt.abortion with message-id
>  wrote:
>
>> Attila < wrote:
>>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:46:22 -0400, stumper
 in
>>> alt.abortion with message-id
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> Attila < wrote:
>>>>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:47:45 -0400, stumper
 in
>>>>> alt.abortion with message-id
>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>> stumper   wrote:
>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>> stumper   wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Do you exist because you think?
>>>>>>>>> I did philosophy 101 in college a
couple of decades ago.  get back to
>>>>>>>>> us when you've learned how little you know.
>>>>>>>> I read philosophy for seven years.
>>>>>>> Ah, so you're a dishonest asshole who uses
philosophy just to
>>>>>>> argue, with no regard for the truth whatever.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How do you know whether the universe exists or not?
>>>>>>> 1st Meditations.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> Philosophy is not science.
>>>>>> Religion is not science.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Science is not good enough for philosophy.
>>>>>> Science is not good enough for religion.
>>>>> Science is too good for either.
>>>>>
>>>> That will do as well.
>>>>
>>>> It seems to be a little silly
>>>> just to be against something.
>>>>
>>>> Can history be scientific?
>>> History has nothing to do with science.
>>>
>> What?
>> You must be real old.
>> Things have changed a lot, I guess.
>> Some historians are clearly working hard
>> to turn history into a social science.
>
> Social science is at best pseudo-science.
>
>> Anyhow, do you trust your government?
>
> Irrelevant and off topic.
>

Can political science be scientific?

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag