CH> CH> author are also guilty of the bombing and murders that occur.  Liddy
CH> CH> took the position that  merely writing a book that provided the
CH> CH> instructions did not make one culpable for the crimes committed by
CH> CH> another, absent some  conspiratorial involvement with the actors.
CH> RT>On this point, I agree with G Gordon Liddy.
CH> RT>RD
CH> So do I within the limitations he stated.
I disagree with you.  Let me give you a purely hypothetical situation.  I 
have a fool proff way to carjack someone and get away scott free.  I know I 
can make some money on it in the criminal world, but I know in the honest 
world the 1st amendment would protect me.  So, I distribute the book to the 
general public.  Someone in your area decides to try it out, in turn killing 
you.  Now, was I or was I not at fault?
If nothing else, this should spurn some interesting conversation.
Peace.
--- CNet/3
---------------