From: r{at}somis.org (òR L Measures)

In article , Robert
 wrote:

> On 25 Mar 2007 09:16:42 -0700, "Lucifer" 
> wrote:
>
> >On Mar 25, 1:51 pm, "sacsc...{at}rsvl.net"
 wrote:
> >> On Mar 24, 9:03?am, Robert  wrote:
> >>
> >> > Acceptable level of rape? IMO zero rapes is the only
acceptable level
> >> > for rape. Keep in mind that many rapes, that are reported, never
> >> > happened. And some consensual sex is considered rape.
Like between a
> >> > 15 year old and a twenty year old.
> >>
> >> A 15 year old is considered too immature to give consent and I would
> >> suggest not placing yourself in a situation where an accusation of
> >> rape can be made. Since rape does occur, zero rapes are not the only
> >> acceptable level. I was just reading that Americans are 19 times as
> >> likely to be raped than Japanese.
> >
> >Depends on the country you are in, in the UK, for example, sex between
> >a 15 year old and a 20 year old is illegal, but not defined as rape as
> >long as it is consensual.
>
>   Some states in the U.S. have even lower age of consent laws, unequal
> justice? In those states it's not even contributing to delinquency of
> a minor. My state, Texas the AOC is 16, give her/him a beer or a
> cigarette you are in a heap o trouble. Fuck their brains out, no
> problem. Nice system huh.

ò  It makes more sense to me than California's AOC of 18.  I know a local
girl who did 19 guys by the time she was 17.   At 15 her maidenhead flew
on it's way and the door of her vagina stands open today.  (takeoff on
Bobby Burns' song "Muirland Meg").

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag