Hello Bob!

13 Aug 08 00:20, you wrote to me:

 RC>> What proof do you have to show that Stan served only 12
 RC>> years?

 BK>  I have his own words in his own newspaper. He has shown 12 years
 BK>  active duty. He was in the service in 1976, out in 1978, back in
 BK>  in 1982, and out in 1992. I allowed room for some time variance,
 BK>  in previous msgs. However, what is documented is 12 years. His
 BK>  own words leave little room for much more than that.

and why does this distress you so?

 RC>> After all I served 0, you served 4 years and a certain
 RC>> someone only 65 days, all uncomparable to the 12 years you
 RC>> attribute to Stan.

 BK>  Which has what to do with anything? Did you paint yourself as a
 BK>  retired Army major?

If I was a certain someone, according to you I could fit an entire tour of
duty in the military within 65 days.

 RC>> Stan commanded a Army Attack Helicopter, you fixed radios.

 BK>  He *FLEW* an Army attack helicopter, in the states. What's your
 BK>  point?

and you fixed radios.

 RC>> Even if your attempted slam against Stan is remotely true,

 BK>  It is a slam against Hardegree's constant attacks on others.

As if these so called others are as pure as driven snow.

 RC>> how is your service superior,

 BK>  Who said anyone's service was superior? It wasn't his service in
 BK>  question, it was his retirement.

Why is your perception of his retirement an issue, using your numbers as
you cite them to be, his service still shows far more days serving full
commitments than whom you defend.

==
Ross
Fidonet Feeds Or Fidonet In Your Newsreader: http://www.easternstar.info
E-mail: ross(at)cassell(dot)us | Blogs/Other Places: http://links.cassell.us
... Martin Luther King Jr, was a Republican!
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20060121