CH> Placing the sign on a public water supply certainly complicates
CH> resolution of the issue. Obviously, merely creating such a sign is one
CH> thing, while placing it on a public water supply is quite another.
CH> Perhaps part of the equation for determining whether such a sign should
CH> be protected under free speech would be if that sign could be construed
CH> to have some legitimate purpose under the immediate circumstances. I
CH> might add that it is sad that circumstances in this country have come
CH> to the point where such a discussion is even neccessary.
I'm sorry, you're wrong in this case Charles. I don't there IS a legitamate
purpose for telling someone how to poison the water supply and therefore kill
me unless that person is in the military to a foreign country and he is on a
specific mission, in which case, may God help us all.
Peace.
--- CNet/3
---------------
* Origin: [FidoNet] Christian \o/ Retreat * Flower Mound, TX * (1:124/3266)
|