Good ${greeting_time}, Victor!

27 Jan 2019 21:12:10, you wrote to Markus Reschke:

 VS>>> Good point. Thank you. Maybe fc00::/7 has a chance of becoming
 VS>>> the new 192.168/16.
 MR>> I'd recommend to use fd00::/8 since fc00::/8 was meant to be some
 MR>> kind of globally unique local address space managed by a registry
 MR>> (-> B2B VPNs).
 VS> fc00::/7 is from RFC4193, and where is fd00::/8 defined?

Guess!


--
Alexey V. Vissarionov aka Gremlin from Kremlin
gremlin.ru!gremlin; +vii-cmiii-ccxxix-lxxix-xlii

... GPG: 8832FE9FA791F7968AC96E4E909DAC45EF3B1FA8 @ hkp://keys.gnupg.net
--- /bin/vi