From: "james g. keegan jr." 

In article ,
 stumper  wrote:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> > In article ,
> >  stumper  wrote:
> >
> >> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>> In article ,
> >>>  stumper  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>>>> In article
,
> >>>>>  stumper  wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article
,
> >>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> God is better handled by social science
> >>>>>>>> than by natural science.
> >>>>>>> did she tell you that personally?
> >>>>>> Does your government talk to you in person?
> >>>>> are you afraid to answer my question?
> >>>> God don't talk to me in person.
> >>> then how can you support your claim above? is it a false claim?
> >> It's just a working hypothesis, dear.
> >
> > you should have labeled it as such. doing so would have made you
> > appear rather stupid, but probably not as dishonest as simply making
> > the claim did.
>
> I did so, many times up front, dear.

in which post, exactly?

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag