From: "james g. keegan jr." 

In article ,
 stumper  wrote:

> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> > In article ,
> >  stumper  wrote:
> >
> >> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>> In article ,
> >>>  stumper  wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>>>> In article
,
> >>>>>  stumper  wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>>>>>> In article
,
> >>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
> >>>>>>>>> In article
,
> >>>>>>>>>  stumper
 wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> God is better handled by social science
> >>>>>>>>>> than by natural science.
> >>>>>>>>> did she tell you that personally?
> >>>>>>>> Does your government talk to you in person?
> >>>>>>> are you afraid to answer my question?
> >>>>>> God don't talk to me in person.
> >>>>> then how can you support your claim above? is it
a false claim?
> >>>> It's just a working hypothesis, dear.
> >>> you should have labeled it as such. doing so would have made you
> >>> appear rather stupid, but probably not as dishonest as
simply making
> >>> the claim did.
> >> I did so, many times up front, dear.
> >
> > in which post, exactly?
>
> Just Goggle this newsgroup
> with "Stumper working hypothesis," please.

i'll take that to mean that you didn't do what you claimed you did.

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag