FRAN wrote:

> Mitch wrote:
>
>> wrote in message
>>news:1111445092.046549.268560{at}l41g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
>>
>>>Straun wrote:
>>>
>>>>Don H wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>It is assumed the wife did it, cos the gun was found next to
>
> her
>
>>>body
>>>
>>>>-
>>>>
>>>>>unless placed there by some third party.
>>>>>==============================
>>>>
>>>>What irks me is that the headlines have changed from
"MAN MURDERS
>>>>FAMILY" to "What drove mum to kill babies". 
Hello, what about
>
> the
>
>>>poor
>>>
>>>>father whose brains she blew out?  Not to mention the implicit
>>>>assumption contained in the two different headlines that the man
>>>
>>>would
>>>
>>>>just go out and kill his family while the "poor
woman" must have
>
> been
>
>>>>driven to it.
>>
>>Maybe that assumption is adopted becuase women normally don't gun
>
> down
>
>>and kill their family.  What drove her to do it?  Maybe we'll find
>
> out.
>
>>But, in
>>any case it is sad when this sort of event occurs.....
>>
>>Regards,
>>Mitch......
>
>
>
> I think mothers killing children account for about 49%, but
>
> a) they are typically psychotic or post-partum
>
> and
>
> b) They typically asphyxiate, or use a blunt instrument, followed next
> by drowning, and drugs
>
> It's also most unusual to kill the husband by any means.
>

Wouldn't want to kill the income; better just
divorce the man and keep the income.

D.

> Fran
>


--- UseNet To RIME Gateway {at} 3/22/05 12:00:09 PM ---