CH> My apology was to the OTHER people in the conference who were not part
CH> of your attacks on me.  I do not see where I have any reason to 
CH> apologize to you, Christopher.  To the contrary, it is YOU who should
CH> be apologizing.  Sadly, that is probably beyond you.
I've already apologized to you in the past in a WAY back echo, but you 
persisted.  If you noticed, I didn't ask for an apology, because one from you 
wouldn't mean anything to me.  Simply put; you wouldn't mean it and I don't 
know you.
CH> Your "deal" is rather one sided and attempts to establish facts that 
CH> are NOT in evidence.  The only "deal" you may make with me is what I 
CH> have been offering all along.  STOP POSTING TO, FROM OR ABOUT ME.  I 
CH> have no reason to want to have ANY discussions now; or in the future 
CH> with you or any member of your gang of cyberspace bullies.  Nor do I
CH> wish to have to continue responding to your feeble attempts to distort
CH> the record.
MY gang?  I don't know these people personally.  As for the posting to, from, 
or about you; you have proven you don't want that because you keep posting to 
me.  It is proven that you want this to keep going on,
--- CNet/3
---------------