| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Message Threading |
-=>> mark lewis wrote to JEAN PARROT <=- ml>> this problem would never have been if folk using fidonet would have ml>> embraced fidonet methods rather than imposing other network's methods ml>> and functions on fidonet... QWK was created in the RIME/PCRelay ml>> network... iirc, bluewave was basically just a better QWK but still ml>> had/has many of the same downfallings... WM> You don't RC. hunh?? WM> Blue Wave is very different from QWK, and very much like Fido. WM> It has no trouble with MSGID and REPLY kludges (notice the WM> REPLY on this message). Why these guys are having problems, I WM> don't know*; but it's not a limitation of the format. to a point, true... there are limitations... WM> * Actually Jean Parrot refers to Doc's Place in the message WM> you quoted, and that board only offers QWK and OPX. Evidently WM> he's using QWK with the Blue Wave reader. That combo of WM> course does NOT support REPLY kludges; in fact, I know of no WM> QWK door that does. exactly... the DOOR should not... the editor should since the editor may have access to the MSGID control line and can create the necessary REPLY control line... the editor can also create the MSGID line straight out... )\/(ark* Origin: (1:3634/12) SEEN-BY: 633/267 270 @PATH: 3634/12 106/2000 633/267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.