On 03-31-10, DAVE DRUM said to TIM RICHARDSON:

-=> TIM RICHARDSON wrote to DAVE DRUM <=-


DD>* A pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism
DD>* has infected the Republican Party. Here's new data to prove it:


TR> Since when does verbally and strongly disagreeing with a president,
TR> become `pathological hatred'?


DD>It doesn't - and no one in the article quoted said it did.


TR> Then....as those are *your* initials in front of that statement, are we
TR> to believe that it is *you* who said it did?


DD>Show me the quote where is says "verbally and strongly disagreeing with a
DD>president" equates to a "pathological hatred". You are
seeing tings that
DD>are not there - again.



*You* typed (and I quote):



"A pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism has infected the
Republican Party. Here's new data to prove it:"



You `did' type that....did you not?


And I answered (and I quote):


"Since when does verbally and strongly disagreeing with a president, become
`pathological hatred'?"


Individuals across the country have strongly, and verbally, disagreed with
this president.


*You* pop up with the notion that it equates to `pathological hatred', and
toss out some left wing writer's article to `prove' your assertion.


Now......you are quibling over words.


By the way...........I never *claimed* the article said any such thing. I
merely posed a question to you. *You* are the one getting all up tight over
it. Get a grip! Not every communication from someone who disagrees with you is
some sort of slam, or accusation.


Try the decaf!

---
*Durango b301 #PE*