-> EC> You should have read the actual story, instead of relying on
-> David EC> Brock's people to accurately relate it.  She said it was
-> "nuts" to EC> overlook record levels of terrorist activity while
-> going after the EC> militias.  She did not say that EC> planning
-> murders is constitutionally protected free speech.

-> Except this is standard M. O. for Pam Geller, *ANY* Muslim
-> organization is "radical," or "terrorist."

The actual story talked about armed camps, not "any" muslim
organization.  And she cites another, longer story on the subject.  I
doubt that you read that one either, although I am sure that you could
conjure up some ad hominems against the writer of the other story as
easily as you just did against her.

You could attempt to support your claim, of course, by citing something
she actually said.  But running to David Brock's web site for some more
prepackaged personal attacks won't do any more good than the first two
times you did that.

--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10