| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | FloriDUH urologist is a m |
Replying to a message of Richard Webb to Bob Ackley: BA>> Incidentally, there is no law in Iowa that requires BA>> motorcyclists to wear helmets (something that drives the BA>> control freaks in the national DOT nutso). The requirement BA>> for hard hats on construction jobs is most likely a BA>> company policy driven by its insurance carrier rather than BA>> a law of any kind. RW> Yep, IOwa motorcycle riders got a helmet law actually RW> repealed in IOwa way back when. I had friends working both RW> sides of that one when it came up. Something over a decade ago the Nebraska legislature, at the behest of the federal DOT bureaucrooks, passed a motorcycle helmet law. The *people* of the state of Nebraska repealed that law with a petition drive sponsored by various organizations of motorcycle riders. DOT bureaucrooks went absolutely ballistic and threatened to cut off Nebraska's highway funds if the legislature did not immediately re-impose that law. The legislature rolled over and played dead for the feds, and passed a new helmet law. Had *I* been the governor I would have announced that (a) I would veto another helmet law and (b) the day federal funds were cut off would be the day that I-80 would not be patrolled or maintained - to include plowing snow and finding, investigating or cleaning up any accidents or other mishaps - until those funds were reinstated. RW> My dad said it was a sad RW> day for the people of IOwa when they repealed it. My old RW> man rode his Harleys and other bikes for years, and never RW> mounted one without his skid lid, and I wasn't allowed to RW> either back when I was doing a lot of playing off road with RW> small motorcycles as a kid. The fact that the state doesn't tell you that you HAVE to wear a helmet doesn't mean that you cannot wear one. It's a freedom thing. The only law a state needs on the books WRT motor vehicle safety is that the failure to use protective equipment is grounds for being held at fault for injuries such equipment would have prevented or mitigated. That's for helmets *and* seat belts (I have worn seat belts religiously since about 1960). ---* Origin: Bob's Boneyard, Emerson, Iowa (1:300/3) SEEN-BY: 10/1 11/200 331 14/400 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 187 140/1 226/0 SEEN-BY: 236/150 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 SEEN-BY: 280/1027 320/119 396/45 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189 SEEN-BY: 2222/700 2320/100 105 5030/1256 @PATH: 300/3 116/901 3634/12 123/500 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.