Mimi Gallandt -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 MG> Ed Hulett -> Jeff Binkley wrote:
 EH>> Jeff Binkley -> Stan Hardegree wrote:



 SH>>>>> Just watch the reaction from the hate women klatch.
 Prepare to
 SH>>>>> see them at their best.

 JB>>>>> Quick, where's Sauer ?

 SH>>>> He started off the hate fest:
 SH>>>> ......

 SH>>>> Well, McBush has completely lost the presidential race.
 SH>>>> How?

 SH>>>> His choice for VP is Sarah Palin.

 SH>>>> An ultra-social conservative, who is on record as
stating that women
 SH>>>> who become pregnant as the result of being raped or
molested, should
 SH>>>> have the baby.

 SH>>>> Like McBush, she says that "life begins at conception."

 SH>>>> When Biden has his debate with Palin, he's going to run over her.
 SH>>>> .......

 SH>>>> It will go downhill from here.

 JB>>> So life doesn't begin at conception ?  When does it begin ?

 EH>> According to some on the left it isn't even human until it pops its
 MG> head
 EH>> out and takes its first breath.

 MG> I believe that you're mistaken on this; until a fetus is born (before
 MG> birth the medical term for an in vitro being is fetus) it isn't a person
 MG> under the law. That's a lot different than saying a fetus isn't human.
 MG> Human is a scientific word for our species, person is a legal term not
 MG> always limited to being a human being. I'm not sure which crackpot judge
 MG> or lawyer came up with the concept of a corporation being a person under
 MG> the law but it is. Is that wacky or what?  :)

I'm not mistaken and it has nothing to do with the law. I have debated with
some on the left who claimed the fetus wasn't human until it took its first
breath. When I ask them if it was a turnip and they start getting personal.

Ed

-- 
 "The principle of government control over    |Linux User# 416016
information is inseparable from the principle |Linux Machine# 385029
of government control over people's lives."
--James Bovard

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)