TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! ANSI
echo: pol_inc
to: Tim Richardson
from: Dave Drum
date: 2010-04-02 09:09:00
subject: Obama Derangement Syndrom

-=> TIM RICHARDSON wrote to DAVE DRUM <=-

 DD>* A pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism
 DD>* has infected the Republican Party. Here's new data to prove it:

 TR> Since when does verbally and strongly disagreeing with a president,
 TR> become `pathological hatred'?

 DD>It doesn't - and no one in the article quoted said it did.

 TR> Then....as those are *your* initials in front of that statement, are we
 TR> to believe that it is *you* who said it did?

 DD>Show me the quote where is says "verbally and strongly disagreeing with a
 DD>president" equates to a "pathological hatred". You
are seeing tings that
 DD>are not there - again.

 TR> *You* typed (and I quote):

 TR> "A pathological hatred of the president posing as patriotism has
 TR> infected the Republican Party. Here's new data to prove it:"

 TR> You `did' type that....did you not?

So?

 TR> And I answered (and I quote):

 TR> "Since when does verbally and strongly disagreeing with a president,
 TR> become `pathological hatred'?"

 TR> Individuals across the country have strongly, and verbally, disagreed
 TR> with this president.

 TR> *You* pop up with the notion that it equates to `pathological hatred',
 TR> and toss out some left wing writer's article to `prove' your assertion.

No, I did not. You are the one who read something I did NOT write into that.
Vociferous objections equating to pathological hatred is YOUR thing - not mine
... unless you can furnish me with a direct quote (which you won't be able to
do, as I never said that) showing that I made that claim.

 TR> Now......you are quibling over words.

Fucking A well told, dood. Words mean things so it is critical to get them
right.
 
 TR> By the way...........I never *claimed* the article said any such thing.
 TR> I merely posed a question to you. *You* are the one getting all up
 TR> tight over it. Get a grip! Not every communication from someone who
 TR> disagrees with you is some sort of slam, or accusation.

Apparently you DID claim such a thing since you equated disagreeing with a
pathological hatred. You did that, not me. And you can't show that I said what
you uttered yourself.

 TR> Try the decaf!

Pot, kettle, black, dood.
 
ENJOY!!!

From Uncle Dirty Dave's Kitchen
Home of YAHOOOOAHHHH Hot Sauce & Hardin Cider 

 

... He's indebted to his memory for his jests and his imagination for his facts
--- MultiMail/Win32 v0.49
* Origin: FidoTel & QWK on the Web! www.fidotel.com (1:124/311)
SEEN-BY: 10/1 11/200 331 14/400 34/999 120/228 123/500 128/2 187 140/1 226/0
SEEN-BY: 236/150 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 100 1381 1404 1406 1418 266/1413
SEEN-BY: 280/1027 320/119 396/45 633/260 267 285 712/848 800/432 801/161 189
SEEN-BY: 2222/700 2320/100 105 5030/1256
@PATH: 124/311 140/1 261/38 633/260 267

SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com

Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.