Ed Hulett -> Mimi Gallandt wrote:
 EH> Mimi Gallandt -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 MG>> Ed Hulett -> Mimi Gallandt wrote:

 MG>>>>>>>> (note: there are no flames in this
reply, unless remarking on
 EH> the
 EH>>>>>>> truth of something is now considered flaming)

 EH>>>>>>> Don't worry, BK will find some part of it
offending. He will then
 MG>>>> use
 EH>>>>>>> that to justify an attack on you.

 MG>>>>>> An attack he knows I won't read but will make
it any way.  :)

 EH>>>>> How dare you insult BK by not reading his tripe. :-)

 MG>>>> I've sworn off tripe.  :)

 EH>>> Some of his stuff is hilarious to read, though.

 MG>> I'm not that easily amused.  :)

 EH> Ah, come on. He's doing his hardest work trying to attack you and you
 EH> ignore him. That's just not fair. :-)

Fair? He's irrelevant, I have no respect for his "opinions". Why
would I care what he "thinks" about me?  :)

-- 
L'Chaim,
Mimi

fcpnmimi(at)cox.net

http://www.myspace.com/fcpnmimi

Whatcha reading?

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (Windows/20080708)