Mimi Gallandt -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 MG> Ed Hulett -> Mimi Gallandt wrote:
 EH>> Mimi Gallandt -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 MG>>> Ed Hulett -> Mimi Gallandt wrote:

 MG>>>>>>>>> (note: there are no flames in this
reply, unless remarking on
 EH>> the
 EH>>>>>>>> truth of something is now considered flaming)

 EH>>>>>>>> Don't worry, BK will find some part of
it offending. He will
 MG> then
 MG>>>>> use
 EH>>>>>>>> that to justify an attack on you.

 MG>>>>>>> An attack he knows I won't read but will
make it any way.  :)

 EH>>>>>> How dare you insult BK by not reading his tripe. :-)

 MG>>>>> I've sworn off tripe.  :)

 EH>>>> Some of his stuff is hilarious to read, though.

 MG>>> I'm not that easily amused.  :)

 EH>> Ah, come on. He's doing his hardest work trying to attack you and you
 EH>> ignore him. That's just not fair. :-)

 MG> Fair? He's irrelevant, I have no respect for his
"opinions". Why would I
 MG> care what he "thinks" about me?  :)

He's relevant in his tiny little mind. :-)

Ed

-- 
"The ultimate result of shielding men from the effects of folly is
to fill the world with fools." --Herbert Spencer
Linux User# 416016
Linux Machine# 385029

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)