Mimi Gallandt -> Ed Hulett wrote:
 MG> Ed Hulett -> Bob Klahn wrote:
 EH>> Bob Klahn -> Mimi Gallandt wrote:

 EH>>>>> Yep. It was Stan who made the comment and the idiot
Klahn is now
 EH>>>>> threatening to post Stan's words back to him in POL_DISORDER.

 MG>>>> What a hypocrite.

 BK>>>  The hypocrisy is in commenting on it in this echo, when I was
 BK>>>  not allowed to respond.

 EH>> Oh, the humanity!

 BK>>>  And the true idiocy is in complaining
 BK>>>  about the *OFFER* to find his comments when he asked about them.

 EH>> You didn't offer, you threatened. As if there was something
 EH>> incriminating in his words.

 MG> IIRC Klahn posted a reply to Vern in an echo that he knew Vern doesn't
 MG> read. This is just another incidence of Klahn saying one thing but doing
 MG> another.

There you go pointing out Klahn's hypocrisy again.

 MG> (note: there are no flames in this reply, unless remarking on the truth
 MG> of something is now considered flaming)

Don't worry, BK will find some part of it offending. He will then use that
to justify an attack on you.

Ed

-- 
 "The principle of government control over    |Linux User# 416016
information is inseparable from the principle |Linux Machine# 385029
of government control over people's lives."
--James Bovard

--- Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)