| TIP: Click on subject to list as thread! | ANSI |
| echo: | |
|---|---|
| to: | |
| from: | |
| date: | |
| subject: | Re: Wine |
Angus McLeod wrote: >>> Bash scripts vs. COMMAND.COM's .BATch language. LOL!!!!!!! >> >> Well, bash wins hands down over .bat files... on the flip side though, >> there's always windows scripting environment, .js or .vbs or .wsh, not to >> mention (ActiveState) Perl, Python, and others being readily available. > > Considering that Perl, Python and a host of others are also available > under Linux, I think it's fair to say it all cancels out and leaves us > back comparing the DEFAULT command language of the two operating systems: > .BATch and (ba)sh... Honestly, depending on what I needed to do, would be more likely to use one of the others (non-default) in either case.. ;) -- Michael J. Ryan - tracker1(at)theroughnecks(dot)net - www.theroughnecks.net icq: 4935386 - AIM/AOL: azTracker1 - Y!: azTracker1 - MSN/Win: (email) --- þ Synchronet þ theroughnecks.net - you know you want it --- SBBSecho 2.12-Win32* Origin: Joe's Computer & BBS -= joesbbs.synchro.net =- (1:275/412) SEEN-BY: 10/1 3 14/250 34/999 90/1 120/228 123/500 140/1 222/2 226/0 236/150 SEEN-BY: 249/303 250/306 261/20 38 100 1404 1406 1418 266/1413 280/1027 SEEN-BY: 320/119 393/68 396/45 633/104 260 267 690/682 734 712/848 800/432 SEEN-BY: 801/161 189 2222/700 2320/100 105 200 2905/0 @PATH: 275/412 400 100 140/1 261/38 633/260 267 |
|
| SOURCE: echomail via fidonet.ozzmosis.com | |
Email questions or comments to sysop@ipingthereforeiam.com
All parts of this website painstakingly hand-crafted in the U.S.A.!
IPTIA BBS/MUD/Terminal/Game Server List, © 2025 IPTIA Consulting™.