BK>BA>> RW>> about attacking a nuclear ally (Pakistan) in the process.

BK>BA>> BK>  The way this war is being fought Pakistan will soon be a
BK>BA>> BK>  nuclearl armed stronghold for the Taliban.

BK>BA>>I find it interesting that the right wing opposes attacking
BK>BA>>terrorist bases in Pakistan and the left wing supports it.
BK>BA>>Thirty plus years ago the left wing opposed attacking terrorist
BK>BA>>bases in Cambodia and the right wing supported it.  AFAICS
BK>BA>>there's no difference between the two situations.

BK> TW> Teh Difference is that Cambodia was a harmless nation even
BK> TW> thouhg it was used for feeding the Viet Cong. Where as
BK> TW> Pakistan is an UNSTABLE Nation with Nuclear Weapons. BEST
BK> TW> you don't make then mad or else you could start something
BK> TW> you might regret. Incidently the RIGHT wing was/is RIGHT in
BK> TW> Both cases.  :-) ---

BK> It sounds like you are saying it's ok to attack a harmless
BK> nation, but not ok to attack one that is a real threat.

BK> Say it ain't so...

He didn't talk this way during the Albright wars of the 90s.


Jeff

CMPQwk 1.42-21 9999 
Democrats --  The party of economic destruction ....


--- PCBoard (R) v15.3/M 10