Ahem A Rivet's Shot wrote:

> For my purposes the benefits it claims are not important which
> means that to me the complexity it brings is a cost with no benefit. Not
> that SysV init is anything other than a dog's dinner with its run levels
> and alphabetical execution ordering. Fortunately the BSD world has sane
> startup systems for those common cases where systemd is gross overkill.

Actually the sysv init with the make approach is what I am using on the
servers. However the company servers are all RHEL and the systemd the reis
99% of the time sane.

The war is over it is pointless to have this discussion further.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05