Hi, Ardith Hinton!
I read your message from 30.03.2023 21:52
ak>> Why do those Infinitives are without "to"?
AH> In formal English, the preposition is generally
AH> included where it may not always be in colloquial speech. What
AH> I see here is a private conversation (i.e. you may notice turns of
AH> phrase Miss Stickler didn't accept). That's the easy explanation for
AH> the last sentence... the other is more complex. Although it struck me
AH> as "not English" with the added preposition, I wasn't really sure why
AH> until after wading through multiple definitions of the verb "to
have".
AH> It seems that if "have" means a third party will be asked &/or
AH> required to do the job the preposition is omitted, as in the first
AH> sentence you asked about. :-)
Ok.
BTW, you called those "to"s as "propositions". But prepositions are put
before nouns? For instance, in English textbook in Russia we call those
"to"s as particles.
Bye, Ardith!
Alexander Koryagin
fido.english_tutor 2023
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
* Origin: Usenet Network (2:5075/128.130)
|