From: stumper 

Attila < wrote:
> On Tue, 27 Mar 2007 13:13:18 -0400, stumper  in
> alt.abortion with message-id
>  wrote:
>
>> Attila < wrote:
>>> On Mon, 26 Mar 2007 21:14:18 -0400, stumper
 in
>>> alt.abortion with message-id
>>>  wrote:
>>>
>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>  duke  wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> ALL evidence demands the existence of almighty God.
>>>>> when you repeatedly post that lie does it mean you
have to confess it
>>>>> multiple times?
>>>> To understand God
>>>> you need to do a paradigm shift first.
>>> Understanding is irrelevant.  First prove any god even exists.
>>>
>>>> God is better handled by social science
>>>> than by natural science.
>>>>
>>>> My working hypothesis for this week is this:
>>>> God is a world government in exile.
>>>>
>>>> If you wanna know whether it even exists,
>>>> you can use the same scientific method
>>>> you would use to establish that your government exists.
>>> Exactly what can a government do?  How is it detected?
>>>
>>> A government itself, and NOT any individual acting in the name of or
>>> for a government, or any construct made by any individual.
>>>
>>> If there exists an island with nothing on it, and especially no
>>> people, exactly what kind of government does it have and what does
>>> that government do?
>>>
>> God is a spirit.
>
> Prove any spirit exists.
>
> I see you did not answer the question.
>
>
>> It's rather like "liberty and equality" of USA government.
>
> The words on a document are unable to do anything.  Are you saying no
> god is able to do anything?
>
>> Do you have any churches in your town?
>
> Irrelevant.
>

What makes you think
you can dictate
how God should exist?

It appears to me,
God would exist in any way He wants. I think God can even exist
and not-exist at the same time.

Have you seen anything like that?

--
~Stumper

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag