29 Jun 09 18:29, Mimi Gallandt wrote to TOM WALKER:

 MG> TOM WALKER -> ROY WITT wrote:

 MG>>>>> Actually if you're talking about the Aurora
Borealis I saw that
 MG>>>>> in Alaska. Real pretty but not worth the trip.

 RN>>>> I'm not, but I'm pretty sure you would not be able to see it
 TW>> from CA.

 RW>>> Can't see thru the smog there!

 TW>> More Texas BULL< SHIT Roy. By the wat are your Euyes Brown??

 MG> It should be noted that I clearly said "I saw that in Alaska."

It should be clearly noted that there is/was a mention of not being able
to see the Aurora lights from CA... SEE: RN>>>

 MG> Maybe geography is different for Texans than it is for the real

It's also very clear that some Californians have no English reading
comprehension and ASSume that other people are ignorant because of that.

 MG> world, but there is no such place as Alaska, CA. Roy also ignores the
 MG> fact that *HUSTON* not any city in California, is the smoggiest city

You're the one who's ignoring the facts on which city is the 'smoggiest'
in the country. It's Los Amgeles and 3 other California cities before you
get to Houston on any list...The misspelling of *HUSTON* [sic] doesn't
bode well with your 'highly educated' statement either.

 MG> in the
 MG> USA. Can you imagine how filthy Huston must be to beat out Los
 MG> Angeles?

It'd have to be very filthy, but then, it isn't so there's no worry there.

 TW>> Onlky a somewhat small portion of Californa is Smog Chokes.
 TW>> In fact here is San Doego County there are Many Smog Free perfect
 TW>> Star Gazing areas. Julian being one somewhat convient one.

 MG> Where I live (the East Village until next week when I move to
 MG> Clairmont) is less than a mile from the big bay so the air is mostly
 MG> clear as glass here.

That's because the smog is over your head there.

                R\%/itt

Joy lives in the fight, in the attempt, in the suffering involved, not in
the victory itself.

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000