From: "Smiler" 


"stumper"  wrote in message
news:VM6dndRHUpXJ-5TbnZ2dnUVZ_rTinZ2d{at}ptd.net...
> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>> In article ,
>>  stumper  wrote:
>>
>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>> In article ,
>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>> In article ,
>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>>>> In article
,
>>>>>>>>  stumper  wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> james g. keegan jr. wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> In article
,
>>>>>>>>>>  stumper
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> God is better handled by social science
>>>>>>>>>>> than by natural science.
>>>>>>>>>> did she tell you that personally?
>>>>>>>>> Does your government talk to you in person?
>>>>>>>> are you afraid to answer my question?
>>>>>>> God don't talk to me in person.
>>>>>> then how can you support your claim above? is it a
false claim?
>>>>> It's just a working hypothesis, dear.
>>>> you should have labeled it as such. doing so would have
made you appear
>>>> rather stupid, but probably not as dishonest as simply
making the claim
>>>> did.
>>> I did so, many times up front, dear.
>>
>> in which post, exactly?
>
>
> Just Goggle this newsgroup
> with "Stumper working hypothesis," please.
>

I get over 50 hits.
Argumentum ad nauseum.

Smiler,
The godless one

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag