27 Jun 09 07:24, Roger Nelson wrote to Roy Witt:

 RN> All of the following is true, except what is false.

LOL! You got that right.

 RW>> 25 Jun 09 18:34, Mimi Gallandt wrote to Roger Nelson:

 RW>> RN>> Alaska is even bigger, but since you can put Montana inside of
 RW>> RN>> Texas, I think Roy is right, as far as the contintental United
 RW>> RN>> States is concerned.

 RW>> MG> Texas' flat landscape isn't a real good selling point.

 RW>> Proof that she's never been in Texas.

 RN> Nope.  She obviously hasn't.

Of course the Spanish were much smarter. When they found a north/south
passage to/from Colorado between two mountain ranges, they named it El
Paso... :o) BTW, the twin cities of El Paso and Ciudad Juarez, just across
the Rio Grande - is the largest 'bi-national' community in the world.

 RW>> MG> Seeing how you live in Louisiana mountains and hills probably
 RW>> don't
 RW>> MG> mean much to you. :)

 RW>> LOL! Nor has she been to Louisiana...

 RN> Nope.  She obviously hasn't.

the next thing you know, they'll try to make like the forests of
California and Montana actually compare to Texas and Lousiana forests.

i.e. Eucalyptus trees are not indiginous to California. They were imported
by a Dr Scripps, who thought California could use some trees besides the
scrawny weed like mesquite bushes growing there. If you ever get to San
Diego and Balboa Park, they have giant eucalyptus trees and a few other
exotics, imported from the south sea area. They even had to import Pecan
trees from Texas so they could enjoy pecans without buying them from
Texans.

                R\%/itt

Joy lives in the fight, in the attempt, in the suffering involved, not in
the victory itself.

--- Twit(t) Filter v2.1 (C) 2000