From: "Smiler" 


"stumper"  wrote in message
news:teGdnZnSfOEX15TbnZ2dnUVZ_r_inZ2d{at}ptd.net...
> Attila < wrote:
>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 22:44:41 -0400, stumper  in
>> alt.abortion with message-id
>>  wrote:
>>
>>> Attila < wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 20:46:22 -0400, stumper
 in
>>>> alt.abortion with message-id
>>>>  wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Attila < wrote:
>>>>>> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 15:47:45 -0400, stumper

>>>>>> in
>>>>>> alt.abortion with message-id
>>>>>>  wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>> stumper   wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Ray Fischer wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> stumper 
 wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Do you exist because you think?
>>>>>>>>>> I did philosophy 101 in college a
couple of decades ago.  get
>>>>>>>>>> back to
>>>>>>>>>> us when you've learned how little you know.
>>>>>>>>> I read philosophy for seven years.
>>>>>>>> Ah, so you're a dishonest asshole who uses
philosophy just to
>>>>>>>> argue, with no regard for the truth whatever.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> How do you know whether the universe
exists or not?
>>>>>>>> 1st Meditations.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Philosophy is not science.
>>>>>>> Religion is not science.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Science is not good enough for philosophy.
>>>>>>> Science is not good enough for religion.
>>>>>> Science is too good for either.
>>>>>>
>>>>> That will do as well.
>>>>>
>>>>> It seems to be a little silly
>>>>> just to be against something.
>>>>>
>>>>> Can history be scientific?
>>>> History has nothing to do with science.
>>>>
>>> What?
>>> You must be real old.
>>> Things have changed a lot, I guess.
>>> Some historians are clearly working hard
>>> to turn history into a social science.
>>
>> Social science is at best pseudo-science.
>>
>>> Anyhow, do you trust your government?
>>
>> Irrelevant and off topic.
>>
>
> Can political science be scientific?
>
Argumentum ad nauseum.

Smiler,
The godless one

--- BBBS/LiI v4.01 Flag