JK>SK>JK>Sorry, sonny.  It is the result of doing intakes on chemically
JK>SK>JK>dependent patients for some 25 years.
JK>SK>I'm not your son...your calling me same just illustrates your lack
JK>SK>of ability to debate with true evidence.
JK>Nope.  It indicates that this 69 year old female is getting sick and
JK>tired of the crap coming from a drug affected source and sounding
JK>more and more sick each time she encounters it.
I've stated that I'm clean and sober for near 1 1/2 years. Is THIS the 
compassion that you give ALL of YOUR ex-patients...or just all people in 
general? If YOU are the model of a "clear-headed" person...then the 
model is broken. I wished to debate with reason...true, said debates 
might become heated...but, that IS the nature of debate...CORRECT? 
JK>The research indicates that the frontal lobe of the brain is
JK>permanently damaged by drug use, that higher mental processes such as
JK>the ability to plan are heavily damaged by drug use.  The research
JK>also indicates that the use of any drug will severely impact
JK>emotional growth of those who use it.
Which drugs? Obviously there is no such research which is so broad 
based. Emotional growth? What emotional factors are involved....love, 
hate, hopes, dreams, inspiration, attachment....you really should 
qualify your statements. For people that have experienced drugs surely 
have problems (like ALL people) but to put the "retard" label on all 
such people is surely cruel, and also bound to be incorrect. 
JK>So the term means that I consider the source in your case.
My....thank you for your kind and gentle manners.
---
* CMPQwk #1.42* UNREGISTERED EVALUATION COPY
--- HyperMail! v1.22
(1:203/1476)
---------------