DD>> and the first with V.34+

IS> No such protocol, outside of marketing.  33.6k V.34 would
IS> perhaps be a more apt and non-brand-specific description for
IS> ITU-T V.34 (1996)?

 DD> At the time it was called V.34+ by USR and all of the
 DD> others who jumped on the bandwagon prior to the
 DD> ratification of V.34 33,600 by the ITU-T

My point exactly; it's a marketing term, not a protocol.  V.34 now covers
rates to 33.6k, and there are no interoperability issues that I've heard of
between V.34 modems with and without the added 31.2k and 33.6k rates, no?

Ian

--- MaltEd 1.0.b5